Two launches, one day

Instinct and Meta’s Muse both gained the ability to place outbound phone calls to businesses on Thursday, according to TechCrunch. The two are direct competitors, and until now calling was the thing Instinct’s rivals could point to and it could not.

Instinct is a San Francisco assistant startup valued at $10bn. Its feature is called Instinct Concierge, and founder Noah Shinn described it as “a white glove service meant to handle high-touch cases”, listing booking restaurants that have no online reservation system, getting a customer onto a dental cancellation list, and resolving a billing dispute with a cable provider.

Meta’s Muse launched on 8 September. Its calling beta is rolling out to US users who specifically asked for the feature. Instinct’s is in early access and will widen over time.

Why the phone

The interesting thing about this capability is what it says about the limits of the web. An assistant that can only act through websites and APIs can do the tasks that someone has already digitised. The tasks that remain stubbornly manual are manual precisely because no one built a form for them.

An old rotary dial telephone resting on a wooden stool
Instinct cites restaurants with no online reservation system as a use case. Illustrative image. Sametraw · pexels · Pexels License

The three examples Instinct gives are all of that kind. A restaurant without an online booking system, a cancellation list held in somebody’s head at the front desk, a billing error that requires arguing with a human. None of these have an endpoint. All of them have a phone number.

What it asks of the other end

The party that has not consented to any of this is the business being called. A dentist’s receptionist taking a call from a software agent is doing unpaid work for the caller’s convenience, and has no way of knowing in advance whether the voice is a person.

Two people wearing headsets at a call centre desk
Neither company has published a disclosure standard for the calls. Illustrative image. Kampus Production · pexels · Pexels License

Neither company has said what disclosure the agent makes at the start of a call, how it handles being asked whether it is a recording, or what happens when the business declines to speak to it. Several US states have laws requiring disclosure of automated voice systems, and this is the kind of feature that finds the edges of them.

The competitive read

Functionally, this brings the two assistants to parity on something rivals had been using as a differentiator against Instinct. That is the immediate reason for the timing.

The longer-term question is volume. Concierge calling is defensible as a premium service handled carefully at low volume. It becomes something else when millions of assistants are dialling small businesses at once, and nothing announced today distinguishes between those two futures. What to watch is whether either company publishes a rate limit, a disclosure standard, or a way for a business to opt out.